FEATURES AND PROBLEMS OF USE IN PROVING RESULTS OF OPERATIONAL-SEARCH ACTIVITY

Author(s): Teplyakova O.A.

Rubric: Criminal law and criminalistics

DOI: 10.21777/2587-9472-2020-3-71-76

Release: 2020-3 (25)

Pages: 71-76

Keywords: criminal procedural proof, evidence, relevance and admissibility of evidence, operational-search activity, operational-search measures

Annotation: The article examines the problems of criminal procedural evidence and the requirements for evidence, namely: relevance, reliability, admissibility and sufficiency. The analysis of the problem of criminal procedural legislation in terms of the norms governing the use of the results of operational-search activities in the criminal process is carried out. The problematic issue of the assessment of indirect evidence is touched upon. It is pointed out that, given the relevance, reliability, admissibility and sufficiency of information obtained in the course of operationalsearch activities, they can become evidence in a criminal case. It is shown that the data obtained in the course of various operational-search measures may contain information directly relevant to a certain criminal case, as well as contain information included in the subject of proof. The requirements for the information contained in the materials of the operational accounting files are generalized, in which there should be indications of the operational-search measure, during which information and data were obtained, allowing to verify this information.

Bibliography: Teplyakova O.A. FEATURES AND PROBLEMS OF USE IN PROVING RESULTS OF OPERATIONAL-SEARCH ACTIVITY // Journal of Legal Sciences. – 2020. – № 3 (25). – С. 71-76. doi: 10.21777/2587-9472-2020-3-71-76