LEGAL AND MORAL CRITERIA OF POLITICAL DECISION IN THE INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICT IN THE TRANSNISTRIA AND DONBASSE

Author(s): Baburin Sergey Nikolaevich

Rubric: Constitutional and municipal law

DOI: 10.21777/2587-9472-2019-3-7-15

Release: 2019-3 (21)

Pages: 7-15

Keywords: recognition of states, human rights, national identity, international law, morality, constitutional guarantees, armed conflict, political solution

Annotation: The problem of peacekeeping capabilities in armed conflicts in the post-Soviet space, the main causes of conflicts, the role of morality and psychology, national identity, cultural-historical, religious and socio-economic features of the regions of instability. Using historical, comparative, formal-legal and other methods of research, the author attempts to identify the legal criteria for peaceful conflict resolution, highlighting the political and legal situation conflicts between Moldova and Transnistria, between Ukraine and the Donbass republics. The conclusion considers the recognition of States that have arisen in conflict zones as the most effective way of political and legal resolution of existing problems.

Bibliography: Baburin SE.NI. LEGAL AND MORAL CRITERIA OF POLITICAL DECISION IN THE INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICT IN THE TRANSNISTRIA AND DONBASSE // Journal of Legal Sciences. – 2019. – № 3 (21). – С. 7-15. doi: 10.21777/2587-9472-2019-3-7-15