ON THE ISSUE OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIVATION AND VALIDITY OF A COURT DECISION

Author(s): Agaronyan E.A.

Rubric: Rostrum of the young scientist

DOI: 10.21777/2587-9472-2025-3-78-84

Release: 2025-3 (47)

Pages: 78-84

Keywords: motivation, validity, civil proceedings, court rulings, court, judicial act, procedural significance

Annotation: The relevance of the topic under consideration lies in the importance of determining and comparing certain properties of law enforcement acts issued by the courts that ensure achieving the goals of civil proceedings. Unmotivated and unfounded court ruling cannot be considered an act of justice, as it lacks certain motives that justify the conclusions of the court set out in the reasoning part. The purpose of the study is to investigate the essence, procedural significance of motivation and validity of court rulings, as well as a comparative analysis of these properties. The author uses methods of scientific cognition of a general nature (logical and system analysis, synthesis), private legal methods of cognition (legal-technical, comparative). As a result, it is concluded that a judicial act in a civil case should not be unmotivated and (or) unfounded, taking into account that these proper- ties equally ensure the procedural legal effect of a court decision, defining it as a judicial act and influencing its legal force, determined by other properties such as commitment, immutability, irrefutability, exclusivity, prejudice, enforceability. In the text of the article, the Russian Federation is abbreviated as RF.

Bibliography: Agaronyan E.A. ON THE ISSUE OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIVATION AND VALIDITY OF A COURT DECISION // Journal of Legal Sciences. – 2025. – № 3 (47). – С. 78-84. doi: 10.21777/2587-9472-2025-3-78-84