CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE OF THE PRIDNESTROVIAN MOLDAVIAN REPUBLIC: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Author(s): Milman I.A.

Rubric: Content, problems and trends in the development of public law

DOI: 10.21777/2587-9472-2021-1-17-21

Release: 2021-1 (27)

Pages: 17-21

Keywords: constitution, prosecutor’s office, rule of law, unrecognized state, authorities, the system of separation of powers

Annotation: The Russian Federation, one of the world powers, and the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic, an unrecognized state, in their Constitutions positioned themselves as legal. Such a constitutional norm rather defines the purpose, but not the statement of the development level of the institutions inherent in the rule of law. Article 2 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and Article 16 of the Constitution of the PMR, which impose on the state the obligation to protect human and civil rights and freedoms, have a direct effect, as do the norms of paragraph 1 of Article 45 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and Article 45 of the Constitution of the PMR, which enshrine state guarantees for the performance of these duties. To varying degrees, all links of the state mechanism are involved in the mechanism of implementation of these guarantees, but the institute of the Prosecutor’s Office occupies a special place. A comparative characteristic of the constitutional status of the Prosecutor’s office in the Russian Federation and the PMR is given.

Bibliography: Milman I.A. CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL STATUS OF THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE OF THE PRIDNESTROVIAN MOLDAVIAN REPUBLIC: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS // Journal of Legal Sciences. – 2021. – № 1 (27). – С. 17-21. doi: 10.21777/2587-9472-2021-1-17-21