ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE METHOD MUTUAL ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER SCHOOL
Author(s): Prokhorova M.P., Lebedeva T.E.
Rubric: Educational environment
Release: 2020-3 (32)
Keywords: mutual assessment, argumentation, critical thinking of students, evaluation criteria
Annotation: The widespread use of electronic educational resources and the increase in the value of an individualized approach in teaching have led to the interest in the application of the method of peer assessment in higher education. Peer assessment allows you to effectively involve students in checking work, develop their argumentation skills, critical thinking, independent decision-making, and also allows you to reduce the load on the teacher with a large number of educational works. This article describes the results of applying the method of peer assessment in training future managers within the discipline of Project Management. The results of a survey of students about the features, advantages and disadvantages of the method of peer assessment are described and interpreted. Conclusions are made about the significant didactic possibilities of the peer-to-peer assessment method in higher education, provided that the assessed tasks are of a heuristic or creative nature, the assessment procedures and criteria are worked out in advance and presented to the students.
Bibliography: Prokhorova M.P., Lebedeva T.E. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE METHOD MUTUAL ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER SCHOOL // Education Resources and Technologies. – 2020. – № 3 (32). – С. 37-43. doi: 10.21777/2500-2112-2020-3-37-43