Journal headings
"Legal sciences"

Annotation: The relevance of the present research is served by the fact that creation of intellectual property rights court in the system of arbitrary courts in RF reopened scientific discussion about the correlation between the jurisdiction of the regular courts and arbitrary courts. Nowadays specialization of judiciary is being prior area of the judicial reform, that’s why issues of jurisdiction and competence of the intellectual property rights court are included into the scientific discourse. Objective: is to develop a model for resolving cases of exclusive rights and arbitration procedural legislation in order to formulate proposals on this basis for improving arbitration procedural legislation. The fundamental basis of the research is built upon dialectical method. The authors also use the other methods of the research which are general scientific and special legal methods including systematic, comparative legal onces, etc. Results: the article examines the features of the content of the legal categories “competence” and “competence” of the intellectual property Court as a specialized judicial body. The analysis of criteria for dividing competence between related bodies is carried out. It shows the General problems in the sphere of implementation by the intellectual property Court of its powers to consider cases within the existing competence. The necessity of changing the composition of the intellectual property Court by introducing the institution of arbitration assessors is proved. It seems appropriate to develop the concept of competence of the court of intellectual rights-a set of jurisdiction and jurisdiction of the case to the specified court, and the criterion for distinguishing the jurisdiction of the dispute is the subject of the dispute and its subject matter. This definition of competence will help to differentiate the powers of the judiciary.

Annotation: The article is devoted to the analysis of several initiatives that are included in the bill on amendments to the Federal law of Russian Federation “On insolvency (bankruptcy)”. Examining the bill, which, if adopted, will turn out to be a major reform in the industry, the author compares the novelties with the current legislative norms and puts forward his assumptions on the possible consequences of the introduction of legislative initiatives. It is also examined legislative initiatives in terms of their impact on reducing self-regulation in the field of bankruptcy and increasing government participation in it. The research method is aimed at finding the validity of the ideas of the developers of the draft law on reforming the bankruptcy industry and also reflects the lack of coordination of legislative initiatives with the professional community of arbitration managers.

Annotation: The article provides an analysis of the practical difficulties encountered in the land-sharing process; Enforcement issues related to compliance with the established procedure for the harmonization of land boundaries. The subject of the analysis includes the provisions of the current legislation governing the above-mentioned issues, as well as law enforcement, including judicial activities. The author highlights the problems of carrying out the procedure for harmonizing the boundaries of land plots, problems encountered in resolving disputes over the boundaries of land plots, analyses the legal approaches to solving problems developed in accordance with established practice, including judicial ones.

Annotation: The purpose of the research is expressed in the need to study the emergence and development of the Institute of entrepreneurship. The article discusses the features of the emergence and development of the Institute of entrepreneurship. The author points out the features of entrepreneurial activity starting from Ancient Russia and ending with the collapse of the USSR.

Annotation: In the article some theoretical issues, which are related to determining the legal status of scientists in Russian Federation, are examined, the needs of the practice in establishing their position in the field of science, as well as in a variety of social relations: scientific, technological and innovative, including digital technologies, labor, are identified. It is paid attention on the fact that there is no single definition of the concept of “scientist” in the legislation of Russian Federation, are not systematized the criteria, according to which persons, engaged in science and research, can be attributed to this category of subjects, and is not determined their legal status.